Verilux Music · Sync Licensing Send a brief

Verilux journal

What the 2025 Music+Sound Awards rewarded in sync

The 2025 Music+Sound Awards results make one point especially clear: choosing a recording, adapting a known song, composing to picture, and supervising a project are different achievements.

The 2025 Music+Sound Awards results are easiest to understand when you do not treat every music category as a song placement. The program separates sync, use of production music, re-recording or adaptation, original composition, and music supervision. Each category recognizes a different piece of work.

Sync is permission to pair music with picture. A buyer normally needs permission for the composition and the sound recording because they are separate works under copyright. Selecting and licensing an existing recording is therefore a different task from commissioning a new score or rebuilding a known composition as a new recording.

There is also a date correction worth making. As of the evidence check on September 3, 2026, the official site said 2026 finalists would be announced on September 23 and winners on October 14. The latest completed results available then were the 2025 Music+Sound Awards winners. This article analyzes that completed 2025 set, not the still-pending 2026 competition.

The sync winners pair one named track with one named use

The 2025 sync results identify a track and the screen context around it. In the film, series, or programme trailer category, the listing names “You Belong” by Nicholas Lawrence Box and Adam Christopher Fischer, performed by Hills x Hills. It also credits Lyric House, supervisor Shelby Comstock Britten at Seismic Productions, and licensing managers James Paolano and Jessica Cole.

The video-game trailer result names “Runamok” by Kris Kovacs and Jesse Chisholm, with Backchat and SWWARMS, alongside Lyric House and music supervision by Space Cowboy. The series or programme result identifies M People’s “Moving On Up,” its writers, two music publishers, Sony Music Entertainment, Sky TV, and Water & Power Productions on the official 2025 results page.

These are not bare song recommendations. The published unit contains a track, rights participants, supervision, and a piece of media. My interpretation is that the full credit chain is part of what makes the examples useful to a songwriter: the song is only one node in work that also includes sourcing, licensing, production, and delivery.

The list does not publish a judging explanation beside each winner. It therefore cannot tell us that a certain genre, catalog age, lyric style, or artist profile caused the result. It tells us which specific music-and-picture combinations were recognized.

Production music is recognized separately from general sync

The program gives “Use of Production Music” its own categories. The film-trailer result names “Alpha Centuri” by Robin Hall, with Power-Haus Creative, A&G Songs Publishing, licensing manager Roy Lidstone, and supervisors Greg Sweeney and Scenery Samundra.

The series or programme single-scene result names “Express Yourself” by Dave Antrell and supervision by Sinead Jenkins. The broadcast-advertising result names “Luna De Amor” by Juan Francisco Fridman and Juan Pablo De Mendonca, performed by Sonora Marta La Reina Con Mamba Negra, with Twenty Below Music and Extreme Music in the published credits.

Production music is created and organized for licensing, but that label does not make it interchangeable with every independent release. A searchable library track may come with alternate versions, concise metadata, and a rights structure built for fast use. If you are comparing representation paths, music libraries and sync agents explains the difference without treating one as a universal answer.

The category split also prevents an overclaim. A production-music winner is not evidence that the same recording won a general sync category. It is recognition inside the unit the awards body actually published.

An adaptation is neither the original recording nor a new composition

The re-recording or adaptation categories make another rights distinction visible. The video-game trailer result identifies an adaptation of Hanumankind’s “Big Dawgs,” arranged by Jordan Chini, with supervisors Raphaella Lima and Michael Sherwood at EA.

The series or programme trailer result identifies “Sweet Caroline,” originally by Neil Diamond, in a re-record arranged by Jack Chown at The Music Lab. The listing separately credits the supervisor, publisher, licensing manager, agency, production company, and director.

An adaptation can preserve the recognizable composition while replacing or reshaping the recording. That matters because the composition and master are different rights. Re-recording a known song may change which sound recording must be cleared, but it does not erase the underlying composition or its publisher.

A new arrangement can replace the recording without touching who controls the underlying song.

For an independent songwriter, the useful lesson is not “covers win.” It is that version strategy can be creative and administrative at the same time. A new arrangement can fit a trailer’s pacing or tone, while the credit list still has to identify who controls the underlying song and who created the new master.

Original composition results recognize music made for the assignment

The original-composition categories cover titles, trailers, gameplay, cutscenes, documentaries, short films, feature films, series, and advertising. Those are composition-to-picture awards, not licensed-song awards.

The 2025 list credits Ruth Barrett for film, series, or programme titles; Alex Seaver and Sebastien Najand for a video-game trailer; Heather Jeanette Miley and Jake Warren for a series or programme trailer; and Gordy Haab for both gameplay and cinematic or cutscene work associated with Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

Other winners include Patrick Jonsson and Jess Dannheisser in separate feature-length documentary listings, Stuart Hancock for short film, Sara Barone and Forest Christenson for feature film, and Philip Kay for broadcast advertising.

My interpretation is that the category architecture shows how much the assignment changes the craft. Music under gameplay must coexist with player action. A title sequence has a fixed duration and introduces a world. A documentary score sits beside nonfiction material. None of those observations is a published judging rule, but each follows from the medium named in the official category.

Music supervision is credited as a body of decisions

The Rising Star Award for Music Supervisor names Alice Benton and supplies a showreel rather than one universal track. Two documented projects are BBC Creative’s “City of Love,” using “Hymne A L’Amour,” and Creme Egg’s “Gooey Love Songs,” which lists ten specially titled tracks.

That unit matters. Supervision can involve a sequence of choices, clearances, briefs, and relationships across a project. It should not be reduced to authorship of every song on the reel.

The broader awards description says the program is open to professionals involved in the creation, composition, sourcing, licensing, briefing, or production of music and sound for media. The 2026 competition details also separate requirements by media type, including games, advertising, trailers, titles, film, and television. Those pages describe scope and submission structure, not a formula for winning.

The most practical pattern is complete credit information

Across the results, the recurring feature is specificity. Tracks are attached to writers, performers, publishers, labels, supervisors, licensing managers, agencies, production companies, and directors where those roles apply. Not every entry has every role, but the credits show that screen music moves through a chain.

Your own metadata should be simpler than an awards page but just as unambiguous. Name the song, writers, ownership shares, recording owner, publisher or administrator, performing-rights organization, contact, and available versions. If those terms are unfamiliar, start with what sync licensing means before preparing a pitch.

The 2025 results do not predict which independent song will place next. They do show several distinct jobs being recognized under one program. Study the right unit: a licensed track for sync, a production-music use, an adaptation, an original score, or a supervisor’s project.

If you have a catalog with clear rights and useful alternate mixes, review how Verilux evaluates artist submissions. The checklist will help you make each song easier to understand before you send it.

If your songs are one-stop and easy-clear

Verilux represents a small, selective roster.

We take 40% of the upfront sync fee on our non-exclusive tier and 0% of your publishing, PRO, or SoundExchange. Compare the three ways to work with us, then apply.

Accepting applications through September 30, 2026.

More from the journal

Back to all posts →